Project

General

Profile

Feature #1551

dynamic timeslot allocations (TCH / SDCCH vs PDCH)

Added by laforge over 1 year ago. Updated about 1 year ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Urgent
Assignee:
Start date:
02/23/2016
Due date:
06/10/2016
% Done:

0%

Spec Reference:

Description

This change affects OsmoBSC/OsmoNITB, OsmoBTS and OsmoPCU.

Basically, the PCU would attempt to use all currently unallocated timeslots, until the BTS receives a channel activation via A-bis, taking away that timeslot from the PCU.


Related issues

Related to OsmoBTS - Feature #1565: Dynamic PDCH / TCH switching: BTS part Closed 02/23/2016 06/10/2016

History

#1 Updated by laforge over 1 year ago

  • Related to Feature #1565: Dynamic PDCH / TCH switching: BTS part added

#3 Updated by laforge over 1 year ago

  • Due date set to 06/10/2016
  • Priority changed from Normal to High

#4 Updated by laforge over 1 year ago

  • Priority changed from High to Urgent

#5 Updated by laforge over 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to neels

#6 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.nitb.log added
  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.pcapng added
  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.patch added
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

(removed: accidental submission in wrong issue)

#7 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.nitb.log)

#8 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.pcapng)

#9 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.patch)

#10 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • % Done changed from 20 to 0

(removing things because I should have posted them in #1565 instead)

#11 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

If it does, I would appreciate details on how this issue differs from #1565. Thanks!

#12 Updated by neels over 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from neels to laforge

Actually, #1565 is the "ip.access compatibility mode".

But please put this issue in context with #1564. Is it an alternative implementation idea,
or is it orthogonal like #1565 to #1564?

#13 Updated by laforge about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from laforge to neels

This ticket is the PCU part of #1565, whcih is the BTS part.

I think the PCU already has everything in place needed. If that's the case, simply close the ticket.

#14 Updated by laforge about 1 year ago

  • Target version set to Dynamic TCH/H TCH/F PDCH

#15 Updated by laforge about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

We do not yet permit dynamic allocation of SDCCH, but the question is how relevant this is.

Also available in: Atom PDF