https://osmocom.org/https://osmocom.org/favicon.ico?16647414092017-03-07T16:04:54ZOpen Source Mobile CommunicationsOsmoHLR - Feature #1970: separate SQN for CS and PS domainhttps://osmocom.org/issues/1970?journal_id=32642017-03-07T16:04:54Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>neels</i> to <i>laforge</i></li></ul><p>At least with the sysmoUSIM-SJS1, no such separation seems to be necessary.<br />There are 1024 SQN slots available (which practically means unlimited).<br />When the MSC and asks for 5 vectors, and then the SGSN asks for 5 vectors, all of those will work.<br />If one of MSC or SGSN goes far ahead of the other (beyond the 1024), an AUTS resync will be performed.<br />So the separation will come naturally from asking for more vectors.</p>
<p>I would resolve this if you agree.</p> OsmoHLR - Feature #1970: separate SQN for CS and PS domainhttps://osmocom.org/issues/1970?journal_id=33612017-03-14T12:38:55Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>laforge</i> to <i>neels</i></li></ul><p>Above comment is ignorant of the implications of the SQN = SEQ || i scheme.<br />Indeed we need separate SQN for CS and PS, or in other words separate indexes per HLR client.</p> OsmoHLR - Feature #1970: separate SQN for CS and PS domainhttps://osmocom.org/issues/1970?journal_id=33632017-03-14T12:40:43Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Is duplicate of</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-2 status-5 priority-3 priority-high3 closed" href="/issues/1969">Feature #1969</a>: add IND for proper UMTS auth resync</i> added</li></ul> OsmoHLR - Feature #1970: separate SQN for CS and PS domainhttps://osmocom.org/issues/1970?journal_id=34172017-03-20T12:48:07Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul><p><a class="external" href="https://gerrit.osmocom.org/2081">https://gerrit.osmocom.org/2081</a></p> OsmoHLR - Feature #1970: separate SQN for CS and PS domainhttps://osmocom.org/issues/1970?journal_id=36512017-04-25T13:57:39Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Resolved</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul>