https://osmocom.org/https://osmocom.org/favicon.ico?16647414092017-07-26T13:08:21ZOpen Source Mobile CommunicationsOsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=47352017-07-26T13:08:21Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>OsmoMSC</i> to <i>OsmoMGW</i></li><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>osmo-mgcp-gw: multiple "BTS"</i> to <i>osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCP</i></li><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/4735/diff?detail_id=7245">diff</a>)</li></ul> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=55772017-10-06T12:29:11Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>dexter</i></li></ul> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=60682017-11-03T13:56:58Zdexter
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>dexter</i> to <i>neels</i></li></ul><p><a class="user active" href="https://osmocom.org/users/91">neels</a>: I have checked on that problem, and I think we got rid of the problem.</p>
<p>See: <a class="external" href="https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/4334/10/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_mgcp.c">https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/4334/10/src/osmo-bsc/osmo_bsc_mgcp.c</a></p>
<p>During the MDCX phase for the BTS side (function fsm_mdcx_bts_cb()) we use lchan->abis_ip.bound_ip, so we will always negotiate the correct BTS ip.</p>
<p>Does this match match the expectations of this ticket?</p> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=60712017-11-03T18:21:32Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul></ul><p>Do we also reject any RTP coming from an IP that wasn't negotiated by MGCP beforehand?</p> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=60772017-11-06T20:59:34Zdexter
<ul></ul><blockquote>
<p>Do we also reject any RTP coming from an IP that wasn't negotiated by MGCP beforehand?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>yes, we do. However, it can be disabled via VTY because it sometimes can make debugging stuff difficult but this is not the default setting.</p> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=61342017-11-07T21:32:15Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>Urgent</i></li></ul> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=62932017-11-20T12:31:32Zneelsnhofmeyr@sysmocom.de
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>neels</i> to <i>dexter</i></li></ul><p><a class="user active" href="https://osmocom.org/users/15">dexter</a>, if we negotiate the IP via MGCP and reject all other BTS IPs, then I consider this issue resolved. I'm not going to test this, trusting your report; please resolve the issue if you consider this done. Maybe we can talk two minutes on this tomorrow...</p> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=63262017-11-22T12:48:18Zdexter
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul> OsmoMGW - Feature #2263: osmo-mgw: support multiple BTS/RNC and pass the IP address via MGCPhttps://osmocom.org/issues/2263?journal_id=74602018-02-06T08:25:59Zlaforge
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Resolved</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul>