https://osmocom.org/https://osmocom.org/favicon.ico?16647414092020-08-17T10:04:16ZOpen Source Mobile CommunicationsOsmoBTS - Bug #4697: osmo-bts-trx ramps down RF-locked transceivers [again]https://osmocom.org/issues/4697?journal_id=193702020-08-17T10:04:16Zpespin
<ul></ul><p>Can you explain with a bit more detail what you saw? as In ramping from what level to what level, etc.</p> OsmoBTS - Bug #4697: osmo-bts-trx ramps down RF-locked transceivers [again]https://osmocom.org/issues/4697?journal_id=193732020-08-17T10:22:39Zfixeria
<ul></ul><blockquote>
<p>Can you explain with a bit more detail what you saw? as In ramping from what level to what level, etc.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I did not measure the levels, but it's easy to see this behavior on the spectrum. It raises the power of RF-locked transceivers up quickly, and them slowly ramps them down again. I believe the ramp down FSM should just skip RF-locked transceivers and do not raise their power up again.</p> OsmoBTS - Bug #4697: osmo-bts-trx ramps down RF-locked transceivers [again]https://osmocom.org/issues/4697?journal_id=193752020-08-17T10:30:53Zpespin
<ul></ul><p>I was referring more to seeing values from logs instead of measuring the power levels, just to have a better understanding on what's going on. It may be some bug in the ramping code related to some specific initial and target values.</p> OsmoBTS - Bug #4697: osmo-bts-trx ramps down RF-locked transceivers [again]https://osmocom.org/issues/4697?journal_id=195942020-09-08T09:53:55Zpespin
<ul></ul><p>Is this still happening after the recent RFMUTE feature being including? There has also been several fixes in the ramping code recently.</p> OsmoBTS - Bug #4697: osmo-bts-trx ramps down RF-locked transceivers [again]https://osmocom.org/issues/4697?journal_id=195992020-09-08T16:12:35Zfixeria
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul><blockquote>
<p>Is this still happening after the recent RFMUTE feature being including?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nope, I am happy to confirm that it has been fixed. Thanks!</p>