Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #1551

closed

dynamic timeslot allocations (TCH / SDCCH vs PDCH)

Added by laforge almost 6 years ago. Updated over 5 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Urgent
Assignee:
Start date:
02/23/2016
Due date:
06/10/2016
% Done:

0%

Spec Reference:

Description

This change affects OsmoBSC/OsmoNITB, OsmoBTS and OsmoPCU.

Basically, the PCU would attempt to use all currently unallocated timeslots, until the BTS receives a channel activation via A-bis, taking away that timeslot from the PCU.


Related issues

Related to OsmoBTS - Feature #1565: Dynamic PDCH / TCH switching: BTS partClosedneels02/23/201606/10/2016

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by laforge almost 6 years ago

  • Related to Feature #1565: Dynamic PDCH / TCH switching: BTS part added
Actions #3

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Due date set to 06/10/2016
  • Priority changed from Normal to High
Actions #4

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Priority changed from High to Urgent
Actions #5

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Assignee set to neels
Actions #6

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.nitb.log added
  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.pcapng added
  • File two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.patch added
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

(removed: accidental submission in wrong issue)

Actions #7

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.nitb.log)
Actions #8

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.pcapng)
Actions #9

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • File deleted (two_calls_then_gprs_starts_working.patch)
Actions #10

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • % Done changed from 20 to 0

(removing things because I should have posted them in #1565 instead)

Actions #11

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

If it does, I would appreciate details on how this issue differs from #1565. Thanks!

Actions #12

Updated by neels over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • Assignee changed from neels to laforge

Actually, #1565 is the "ip.access compatibility mode".

But please put this issue in context with #1564. Is it an alternative implementation idea,
or is it orthogonal like #1565 to #1564?

Actions #13

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
  • Assignee changed from laforge to neels

This ticket is the PCU part of #1565, whcih is the BTS part.

I think the PCU already has everything in place needed. If that's the case, simply close the ticket.

Actions #14

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Target version set to Dynamic TCH/H TCH/F PDCH
Actions #15

Updated by laforge over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

We do not yet permit dynamic allocation of SDCCH, but the question is how relevant this is.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF

Add picture from clipboard (Maximum size: 48.8 MB)