SIM card related Projects » SIMtrace 2

laforge wrote:

In #5768 mschramm implied that it would be good to have "combined" firmware files for production of devices.

It was SYS#5768, not OS#5768

What are you two doing? It was OS#5584.

As for "which ones".. why just publish all files, there is no point filtering, if we want to save bandwidth we should just move all files older than 1-2 years into storage... In practice the combined images are useless except for production flashing and should be "published" internally, but that would even be more work and would not improve anything.

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 04:22:12PM +0000, Hoernchen wrote:

As for "which ones".. why just publish all files, there is no point filtering, if we want to save bandwidth we should just move all files older than 1-2 years into storage...

it's less about bandwidth than providing even more (maybe even nonsensical) options.

In practice the combined images are useless except for production flashing and should be "published"
internally, but that would even be more work and would not improve anything.

we might compromise by putting them into a sub-directory "production-flash-images" or the like.

Hoernchen wrote in #note-4:

What are you two doing? It was OS#5584.

So true... it is #5584.

In practice the combined images are useless except for production flashing and should be "published" internally, but that would even be more work and would not improve anything.

I only need the "cardem for QMOD" combined image (in the test rig), I can live w/o all the other combinations.

According to lynxis , the owhw test fixture also uses a combined image, and also only the cardem variant. Whereas I'm fine with a 'latest' naming, he wishes to see the combined versions also with version number (e.g. "owhw-cardem-combined-0.8.1.40-5f651.bin" in /all subdir (and "owhw-cardem-combined-latest.bin" in both /all and /latest))

So, the request would go for "cardem for qmod" and "cardem for owhw" combined images.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:45:24AM +0000, mschramm wrote:

So, the request would go for "cardem for qmod" and "cardem for owhw" combined images.

what about simtrace2 production? combined "trace for simtrace" to flash that all-in-one?

According to lynxis , the owhw test fixture also uses a combined image, and also only the cardem variant. Whereas I'm fine with a 'latest' naming, he wishes to see the combined versions also with version number (e.g. "owhw-cardem-combined-0.8.1.40-5f651.bin" in /all subdir (and "owhw-cardem-combined-latest.bin" in both /all and /latest))

• /all => e.g. "owhw-cardem-combined-0.8.1.40-5f651.bin"
• /latest => e.g. "owhw-cardem-combined-latest.bin"

TLDR; I would like to wish a remsim combined image. It is one step less to do something in the wrong way.

laforge wrote in #note-8:

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:45:24AM +0000, mschramm wrote:

So, the request would go for "cardem for qmod" and "cardem for owhw" combined images.

what about simtrace2 production? combined "trace for simtrace" to flash that all-in-one?

ping roh ?

laforge wrote in #note-11:

see the various *combined.bin images at https://downloads.osmocom.org/binaries/simtrace2/firmware/latest/
I decided to build cardem for BOARD=ngff-cardem,owhw,qmod and trace for BOARD=simtrace

Thanks!

Could someone please purge the dfu-dfu files in the /all subdir (>400 files) ?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 05:16:22PM +0000, mschramm wrote:

Could someone please purge the dfu-dfu files in the /all subdir (>400 files) ?

done.

laforge wrote in #note-8:

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:45:24AM +0000, mschramm wrote:

So, the request would go for "cardem for qmod" and "cardem for owhw" combined images.

what about simtrace2 production? combined "trace for simtrace" to flash that all-in-one?

i have always flashed the bl via bossac ( simtrace-dfu-flash.bin ) and then the trace ( simtrace-trace-dfu.bin ) via dfu in production. i cannot remember using a combined image there ever.