Make a new release » History » Revision 53
Revision 52 (pespin, 03/05/2018 01:59 PM) → Revision 53/115 (pespin, 03/05/2018 02:05 PM)
{{>toc}}
h1. Make a new release
The efforts to automate the release process are tracked in https://projects.osmocom.org/issues/1861
h2. When to make a new release
Various Osmocom projects depend on others.
*Proposed policy:*
* master branch is expected to depend on latest master branches of depended-upon projects
* make release of depended-upon projects if necessary before making non-library project release
* make sure that we have correct version dependencies before making non-library project release
Alternatively/additionally we can make timely releases of non-library projects (and corresponding depended-upon libraries):
* once per XX months?
* before every OsmoDevCon?
* once YY items accumulated in TODO-RELEASE file(see [[Make_a_new_release#TODO-RELEASE-file-format-and-maintenance|TODO-RELEASE file format]])
* when configuration/db format changes?
This would help to avoid batching too many changes together and to adhere to RERO better - see http://scalare.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2015-Why-and-HowShould-OpenSource-ProjectsAdopt-Time-Based-Releases.pdf
h2. Dependencies
The @osmo-release.mk@ requires several extra dependencies. Make sure you have them installed in your system:
* bumpversion
* git-buildpackage
* devscripts
h2. How to make a new release
First we outline specific steps for different project types, than common part. The @osmo-release.mk@ helper (installed by @libosmocore-dev@) available via @make release@ takes care of
* version bump
* debian/changelog update
* commit
* sign
* tag
Feel free to send patches implementing further automation as you see fit.
h3. Library release
* modify @*_LIBVERSION@ in @src/Makefile.am@ as necessary according to TODO-RELEASE file
* if necessary ("current" component of @*_LIBVERSION@ was bumped) then rename @debian/lib*.install@ to match the change
* if necessary (any of @debian/lib*.install@ were renamed) then adjust @debian/control@ accordingly
The release helper is trying to be smart about it and prevent making new library release with non-empty TODO-RELEASE file if @*_LIBVERSION@ is not adjusted beforehand.
h3. Non-library release
Nothing special is required ATM.
h3. Common steps
Be default @make release@ prepares 'patch' release but you can manually specify any of 'major/minor/patch' as necessary - see http://semver.org/ for details.
* @make REL=minor release@
* inspect the latest commit which was just created
* adjust it if necessary and re-sign (see [[Make_a_new_release#How-to-retag-a-new-release|Re-tag new release]])
* push commit for review using @git review -f@ (see [[Gerrit]] for alternatives)
* push the release tag by @git push gerrit --tags@
* consider preparing article for https://osmocom.org/news/ and sending announcement to appropriate ML for major release once release commit passed the review
h2. Which new release to make
Use following guidelines when choosing release type:
* major - ?? TBD
* minor - ?? TBD
* patch - ?? TBD
If unsure - ask in corresponding ML.
h2. Deprecation policy
Functions/interfaces marked as deprecated for X releases of type Y can be removed in next Z release.
TBD: what's appropriate value for X? which Y and Z (from major/minor/patch) should we use?
h2. TODO-RELEASE file format and maintenance
* all the strings which contain @#@ considered comment and will be ignored
* actual entries consists of 3 tab-separated fields:
# library - name of the library affected (should correspond to @lib*.pc.in@ file in project's root directory)
# what - API or ABI change (used as a guidance to properly bump @*_LIBVERSION@)
# description - textual description (will end up in changelog)
When change affecting library's API/ABI is made than new entry should be added to TODO-RELEASE according to the format above. The file will be claned-up automatically by @make release@ command.
h2. How to (re)tag a new release
This might be necessary if previous release was made manually with some mistakes which have to be corrected and amended to the release commit.
<pre>
git tag -s 0.4.0 -f -m "Release v0.4.0 on 2017-08-25."
</pre>
This will automatically (re)sign the latest commit. You can specify which commit to sign explicitly.
Say, for example, the git hash is @012342abcdefg@ and the next open version is 0.1.3:
<pre>
git tag -s 0.1.3 012342abcdefg -m "release 0.1.3"
</pre>
(If @gpg@ complains, see [[Make a new release#GPG-Have-a-matching-user-id|GPG: Have a matching user id]].)
Verify that git picks up the new version tag:
<pre>
$ git describe
0.1.3-3-g1f95179
</pre>
N. B: *For your local build, _nothing will change_ until you delete the @.version@ file and completely rebuild:*
<pre>
rm .version
autoreconf -fi
./configure
make
cat .version
</pre>
This should show the same as @git describe@.
When you're convinced that all is in order, push the new tag:
<pre>
git push origin 0.1.3
</pre>
If anything went wrong, you can delete the tag (locally) by
<pre>
git tag -d 0.1.3
</pre>
and, if you've already pushed it, by
<pre>
git push --delete origin 0.1.3
</pre>
h2. GPG: Have a matching user id
By default, @git tag -s@ takes your author information to lookup the secret GPG key to sign a tag with.
If the author+email do not exactly match one of the key's @uid@s, you will get this error:
<pre>
gpg: signing failed: secret key not available
</pre>
Verify: say, your author+email info in your git config says "John Doe <john@doe.net>", try
<pre>
gpg --list-secret-keys "John Doe <john@doe.net>"
</pre>
If this fails, GPG won't find the right key automatically.
Ways to resolve:
* Use @git tag -u <key-id>@
* Edit your secret key to add a uid that matches your author information
<pre>
gpg --edit-key john@doe.net
gpg> adduid
# enter details to match the git author
gpg> save
</pre>